Case study: Return of 43 ceremonial and sacred objects to Aboriginal communities

 

2020 marked the 250th anniversary of James Cook’s first voyage to the east coast of Australia
and the beginning of the large-scale removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural
heritage to overseas collections. Coinciding with the anniversary, the Australian Institute of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) proposed and led a project, funded by the
Australian government, called the Return of Cultural Heritage (RoCH) project.


AIATSIS is an Australian government statutory authority focused exclusively on the diverse
history, cultures and heritage of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australia. The RoCH project
aimed to facilitate and secure the return of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural heritage
materials, to document relevant material held by overseas collecting institutions and to build
relationships between those institutions, AIATSIS and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
communities.


As a component of this project, AIATSIS contacted Manchester Museum, which is part of the
University of Manchester. The museum’s collections include a number of objects which had
originally belonged to various Australian indigenous communities but which had been part of the
collections since the 1920s. The initial request was for data sharing but also asked if Manchester
would consider a return request from communities.

At the time of the request, Manchester Museum’s collection policy did not specifically set down
a procedure for the repatriation of sacred or ceremonial items. The museum’s Director, Esme
Ward, took the view that the focus of museums should be upon people and their relationship
to collections. She liaised with AIATSIS who facilitated the negotiations on behalf of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Nations. AIATSIS led the return process, working with Manchester
Museum on provenance research and undertaking the extensive community engagement
required to prepare the return request. Esme said that, ‘By taking this action Manchester
Museum will become more inclusive, caring and relevant to the communities it serves both
locally and globally.’ This approach mirrored the attitude of the University of Manchester, where
great emphasis is placed upon the importance of social responsibility.


The extensive and time-consuming research to understand the provenance of the objects was
not only conducted by Manchester and AIATSIS staff through museum documentation and other
archival records, but also through the engagement with named communities to draw upon the
knowledge of Traditional Owners and custodians. Using the ‘ask first’ principles it was ultimately
community Elders who determined which objects would be the subject of the return request.
This information could then be presented to the University of Manchester’s Board of Governors,
which greatly assisted the Board in coming to a prompt and unanimous decision to approve the
unconditional repatriation of 43 collection items to the Aranda people of Central Australia, the
Gangalidda and Garawa peoples of northwest Queensland, the Nyamal people of the Pilbara and
the Yawuru people of Broome. It was the first time Manchester Museum had repatriated sacred
or ceremonial materials, rather than human (ancestral) remains.


In late November 2019, a live-streamed formal handover ceremony took place at Australia
House, London, with delegates from Gangalidda Garawa and AIATSIS acting on behalf of
Nyamal along with dignitaries, university staff and museum professionals.
‘The repatriation of our sacred cultural heritage items is a fundamental part of the healing
and reconciliation process, both within our communities and between our mob and the
Government,’ Mangubadijarri Yanner, Representative for the Gangalidda and Garawa Native Title
Aboriginal Corporation said. ‘Bringing these sacred cultural heritage items back to Country is
important and necessary for the purpose of cultural revitalisation – because locked deep within
these items is our lore; our histories, our traditions, our livelihoods and our stories.’


A key characteristic of the process was transparency at every stage. This reassured
communities that the museum was acting in good faith and ensured the museum could have
confidence that the request was coming from those with the knowledge and authority to do so.
Key documents will be made publicly available where appropriate and only with the permission
of communities. Knowledge pertaining to the secret sacred materials was not included.


AIATSIS and the University of Manchester have signed a Memorandum of Understanding
encompassing a commitment from both parties to collaborate and share knowledge on how
to manage collections which include items related to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
communities. This commitment typifies all aspects of the repatriation, which focused on the
wealth of mutual understanding and knowledge to be gained from a collaborative enterprise
which was approached with care and sensitivity on all sides.


Further information can be found at: www.museum.manchester.ac.uk/about/repatriation